On May 13, 2011, United States District Attorney Timothy Heaphy filed a Joint Notice of Parties' Intent to Submit a Proposed Case Management Order. On May 19, 2011 that document was filed in the court and on that same day the Amended Scheduling Order given below was ordered and filed as document 17 in the case document file for case 3:11-cv-00015.
The schedule indicates two different tracks dependent on the adequacy of the Administrative Record due on June 30, 2011.
Note that it is possible that the case can actually be settled at anytime by the parties in the case.
The schedule indicates two different tracks dependent on the adequacy of the Administrative Record due on June 30, 2011.
Note that it is possible that the case can actually be settled at anytime by the parties in the case.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION
COALITION TO PRESERVE MC INTIRE PARK, et. al.,
Plaintiffs;
v.
VICTOR MENDEZ, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant.
Plaintiffs;
v.
VICTOR MENDEZ, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant.
Civil No. 3:11-cv-00015
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
UPON CONSIDERATION of the parties' Joint Proposal Case Sceduling Order, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall abide by the following dates and deadlines.
Defendant's Production of the Administrative Record with Index in Electronic Format - June 30, 2011
Track 1 (Agreement is Reached as the Scope of the Administrative Record)
If Plaintiffs Do Not Object toe the Scope of the Administrative Record, Plaintiffs So Notify the Defendants and the Court - August 12, 2011
Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgement Due - October 7, 2011
Defendants' Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement Due - November 7, 2011
Plaintiffs' Reply and Opposition to Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement Due - December 2, 2011
Respondent's Reply on Summary Judgement Due - December 23, 2011
Track 2 (Agreement is Not Reached as the Scope of the Administrative Record)
Plaintiffs' Motion for Modification of the Administrative Record Due - August 26, 2011
Defendants' Opposition thereto Due - September 16, 2011
Plaintiff's Reply Due - September 23, 2011
ENTERED this 19th day of May, 2011
Defendant's Production of the Administrative Record with Index in Electronic Format - June 30, 2011
Track 1 (Agreement is Reached as the Scope of the Administrative Record)
If Plaintiffs Do Not Object toe the Scope of the Administrative Record, Plaintiffs So Notify the Defendants and the Court - August 12, 2011
Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgement Due - October 7, 2011
Defendants' Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement Due - November 7, 2011
Plaintiffs' Reply and Opposition to Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement Due - December 2, 2011
Respondent's Reply on Summary Judgement Due - December 23, 2011
Track 2 (Agreement is Not Reached as the Scope of the Administrative Record)
Plaintiffs' Motion for Modification of the Administrative Record Due - August 26, 2011
Defendants' Opposition thereto Due - September 16, 2011
Plaintiff's Reply Due - September 23, 2011
ENTERED this 19th day of May, 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment